Neuropsychological screening for schizophrenia: A brief tool to assess subtypes of schizophrenia
PDF

Palabras clave

Catatonia
psiquiatría biológica
hebefrenia
delirio paranoide
córtex prefrontal
endofenotipo.

Cómo citar

Uribe, E., & Torres, M. (2018). Neuropsychological screening for schizophrenia: A brief tool to assess subtypes of schizophrenia. Revista eNeurobiología, 9(21). https://doi.org/10.25009/eb.v9i21.2569

Resumen

La esquizofrenia genera un deficit neuropsicologico relacionado con funciones frontales, pero en la actualidad no existen baterías capaces de discriminar los diferentes patrones de afectación neuropsicologica. Debido a esto, desarrollamos una batería neuropsicologica que involucra las afectaciones cognitivas más comunes en cada subtipo clínico de la esquizofrenia. Para su validación, se determinó la consistencia interna de la batería mediante el coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. Los resultados de la batería fueron correlacionados con la MCCB (MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery) y BACS (Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia). La habilidad de la batería para discriminar entre controles y pacientes con esquizofrenia fue determinada mediante la curva ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic). La consistencia interna fue de 0,868 y la mayoría de los test de la batería correlacionan significativamente entre ellos. Nuestra batería no tuvo correlaciones con MCCB (p:0,937) y BACS (p:0,496). La curva ROC generó un punto de corte entre controls y esquizofrénicos de 17 puntos, con una sensibilidad de 96,6% y especificidad de 95,0%. El área bajo la curva ROC fue 0,990 (CI: 95%; 0,490; p < 0.0001). Además, nuestra batería puso en evidencia propiedades de agrupación para cada subtipo clínico de la esquizofrenia. En conclusión, nuestra batería es capaz de identificar diferentes patrones de afectación neuropsicológica en todos los subtipos clínicos de la enfermedad.

 

Abstract

Schizophrenia generates neuropsychological deficit related to prefrontal functions, but there no existent batteries capable to identify different patterns of neuropsychological affectation. Therefore, we developed a brief neuropsychology battery which encompasses the most frequent cognitive deficits in every clinical subtype of the disease. In line with this, an internal consistency of Schizophrenia´s Neuropsychological Screening (SNS) was determined with Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. The SNS total score was correlated with MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) and with Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS). The ability of the SNS to discriminate neuropsychological profile of healthy controls from patients diagnosed with schizophrenia was determined using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The results of this study showed that Internal consistency of the SNS (Cronbach’s alpha) was 0.868, and most subtests correlated significantly between themselves. SNS did not correlate with classic neuropsychological batteries for schizophrenia MCCB (p:0,937) neither with BACS (p:0,496). The ROC curve analysis on the SNS total score between healthy controls and schizophrenic patients generated a cutoff score of 17 points with a sensitivity of 96.6% and specificity of 95.0%. Area under the ROC curve was 0.990 (CI: 95%; 0,490; p < 0.0001). Moreover, the SNS showed neuropsychological clustering properties for every clinical subtype of schizophrenia. In conclusion, SNS is a new kind of neuropsychological battery which is capable of identifying specific patterns of neuropsychological affectation in all the clinical presentations of schizophrenia.

Keywords: Catatonia; biological psychiatry; hebephrenia; paranoid delusion; prefrontal cortex; endophenotype.

https://doi.org/10.25009/eb.v9i21.2569
PDF

Citas

Lehman A, Lieberman J, Dixon L, McGlashan T, Miller A, Perkins D, Kreyenbuhl J. Practice Guideline for the treatment of patients with Schizophrenia. Americam Psychiatric Association. Second Edition. 2004 165-171.

De Leeuw M, Bohlken M, Mandl R, Kahn R & Vink M. Reduced fronto–striatal white matter integrity in schizophrenia patients and u naffected siblings: a DTI study. NPJ Schizophr.2015 15001: 1-6.

Uribe E. Neuropsychological subtypes of schizophrenia and prefrontal circuits. ENeurobiología. 2016 7(15):280516.

Mueser K & McGurk S. Schizophrenia. 2004 Lancet. 19: 2063-2072.

Laurenson C, Gorwood P, Orsat M, Lhuillier JP, Le Gall D, Richard-Devantoy S. Cognitive control and schizophrenia: The greatest reliability of the Stroop task. Psychiatr Res. 2015 30: 10-6.

Dodell-Feder D, Tully LM, Lincoln SH, Hooker CI. The neural basis of theory of mind and its relationship to social functioning and social anhedonia in individuals with schizophrenia. Neuroimage Clin. 2013 27: 154-163.

Radulescu A, Rubin D, Strey H & Mujica-Parodi L. Power Spectrum Scale Invariance Identifies Prefrontal Dysregulation in Paranoid Schizophrenia. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 33: 1582-1593.

Sienaert P, Dhossche D, Vancampfort D, Hert M, Gazdag G. A. Clinical Review of the Treatment of Catatonia. Front Psychiatry. 2014 5: 181.

Northoff G, Nagel D, Danos P, Leschinger A, Lerche J, Bogerts B. Impairment in visual–spatial function in catatonia: a neuropsychological investigation. Schizophr Res. 1999 37: 133–147.

Northoff G, Steinke R, Nagel D, Czerwenka C, Grosser O, Danos P, Bogerts B. Right lower prefronto-parietal cortical dysfunction in akinetic catatonia: a combined study of neuropsychology and regional cerebral blood flow. Psychol med. 2000 30: 583-596.

Bark R, Dieckmann S, Bogerts B, Northoff G. Deficit in decision making in catatonic schizophrenia: an exploratory study. Psychiatr Res. 2005 134: 131-141.

Bonelli R, Cummings J. Frontal-subcortical circuitry and behavior. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2000 9: 141-151.

Tekin S, Cummings J. Frontal-subcortical neuronal circuits and clinical neuropsychiatry: an update. J Psychosom Res. 2002 53: 647-654.

American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM V), 5th edition. 2013 American Psychiatric Association, Washington D.C.

Wheeler A, Wessa M, Szeszko P, Foussias G, Chakravarty M, Lerch J, Voineskos A. Further Neuroimaging Evidence for the Deficit Subtype of Schizophrenia: A Cortical Connectomics Analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 2015 72: 446-455.

Galderisi S, Bucci P, Mucci A, D'Amato AC, Conforti R, Maj M. Simple schizophrenia: a controlled MRI and clinical/neuropsychological study. Psychiatr Res. 1999 91: 175-184.

Wix-Ramos R, Moreno X, Capote E, González G, Uribe E, Eblen-Zajjur A. Drug treated schizophrenia, schizoaffective and bipolardisorder patients evaluated by qEEG absolute spectral powerand mean frequency analyis. ClinPsychopharmacolNeurosci 2014 12:48-53.

Buchanan RW, Strauss ME, Kirkpatrick B, Holstein C, Breier A, Carpenter WT. Neuropsychological impairments in deficit vs. nondeficit forms of schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994 51:804–11.

Asami T, Saito Y, Whitford TJ, Makris N, Niznikiewicz M, McCarley R, Kubicki M. Abnormalities of middle longitudinal fascicle and disorganization in patients withschizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2013 143: 253-259.

Badcock J, Dragović M, Garrett C, Jablensky A. Action (verb) fluency in schizophrenia: getting a grip on odd speech. Schizophr Res. 2011 126: 138-143.

Hella P, Niemi J, Hintikka J, Otsa L, Tirkkonen J, Koponen H. Disordered semantic activation in disorganized discourse in schizophrenia: a new pragma-linguistic tool for structure and meaning reconstruction. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013 48: 320-328.

Nenadic I, Maitra R, Langbein K, Dietzek M, Lorenz C, Smesny S, Gaser C. Brain structure in schizophrenia vs. psychotic bipolar I disorder: A VBM study. Schizophr Res. 2015 165: 212-219.

Yoon J, Minzenberg M, Ursu S, Ryan B, Wendelken C, Ragland J, Carter C. Association of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex dysfunction with disrupted coordinated brain activity in schizophrenia: relationship with impaired cognition, behavioral disorganization, and global function. Am J Psychiatry. 2008 165: 1006-1014.

Ortiz B, Gadelha A, Higuchia C, Noto C, Medeiros D, Pitta J, Bressan R. Disorganized symptoms predicted worse functioning outcome in schizophrenia patients with established illness. Clin Schizophr Relat Psychoses. 2015 24: 1-18.

Tandon R, Gaebel W, Barch DM, Bustillo J, Gur R, Heckers S, Carpenter W. Definition and description of schizophrenia in the DSM-5. Schizophr Res. 2013 150: 3-10.

Uribe E, Wix R. Conexión sináptica y esquizofrenia. Neurocien Colom 2011 18:258-271.

Uribe E, Wix R. Migración Neuronal y esquizofrenia. Neurocien en Colom 2010 17: 45-60.

Uribe E, Wix R. Epigenetic control of theGABAergicinterneuronsmigration and NMDA receptor functioning in schizophrenia. eNeurobiología 2011 2:1-13.

Rangel A, Muñoz C, Ocampo M, Quintero C, Escobar M, Botero S, García J. Neurocognitive subtypes of schizophrenia. Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2015 43: 80-90.

American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM IV), 4th edition. American Psychiatric Association, Washington D.C. 1994.

Wilhelm O, Hildebrandt A, Manske K, Schacht A, Sommer W. Test battery for measuring the perception and recognition of facial expressions of emotion. Front Psychol 2014 13;5:404.

Dubois, B., Slachevsky, A., Litvan, I., Pillon, B. The FAB: A frontal assessment battery at bedside. Neurology. 2000 55,1621 –1626.

Salo R, Henik A, Nordahl TE, Robertson LC. Time course of inhibition and facilitation in patients with schizophrenia. Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2002 7(4):283-300.

Luria, A.R. Higher cortical function in man. London: Tavistock. 1966.

Chechlacz M, Novick A, Rotshtein P, Bickerton WL, Humphreys GW, Demeyere N. The neural substrates of drawing: a voxel-based morphometry analysis of constructional, hierarchical, and spatial representation deficits. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 26(12):2701-15.

Humphreys, G. W., Bickerton, W. L., Samson, D., & Riddoch, M. J. The Birmingham Cognitive Screen (BCoS) (1st ed.) 2012 London: Psychology Press.

Vetter T, Poggio T, Bülthoff HH. The importance of symmetry and virtual views in three-dimensional object recognition. Curr Biol. 1994 4(1):18-23.

Della Sala S, Laiacona M, Spinnler H, Trivelli C. Poppelreuter-Ghent's Overlapping Figures Test: its sensitivity to age, and its clinical use. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1995 10(6):511-34.

Rubin DC, Butters N. Clustering by alcoholic Korsakoff patients. Neuropsychologia. 1981 19(1):137-40.

Gaudino EA, Geisler MW, Squires NK. Construct validity in the Trail Making Test: what makes Part B harder? J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1995 17(4):529-535.

Wilson, B. A., Alderman, N., Burgess, P. W., Emslie, H., & Evans, J. J. Behavioural assessment of dysexecutive syndrome. Bury St Edmunds, 1996 UK: Thames Valley Test Company.

Manly J, Smith C, Crystal H, Richardson J, Golub E, Young M, Greenblatt R, Robison E. Relationship of ethnicity, age, education, and reading level to speed and executive function among HIV+ and HIV- women: The WIHS Neurocognitive Substudy. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011 33(8): 853–863.

Hodges, J.R. Cognitive assessment for clinicians. 1994 Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Adrados H, Labra G, Bernados S, Moreno G. Evaluation Battery for Semantic Memory Deterioration in Alzheimer. Psychology in Spain 2001 5(1), 98-109.

Balconi M, Bortolotti A. Emotional face recognition, empathic trait (BEES), and cortical contribution in response to positive and negative cues. The effect of rTMS on dorsal medial prefrontal cortex. Cogn Neurodyn. 2013 7(1): 13–21.

Ridderinkhof KR, Ullsperger M, Crone EA, Nieuwenhuis S. The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science. 2004 306(5695):443-7.

Fuster JM. The cognit: a network model of cortical representation. Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 60(2):125-132.

Nuechterlein KH, Green MF, Kern RS, Baade LE, Barch DM, Cohen JD, Essock S, Fenton WS, Frese FJ 3rd, Gold JM, Goldberg T, Heaton RK, Keefe RS, Kraemer H, Mesholam-Gately R, Seidman LJ, Stover E, Weinberger DR, Young AS, Zalcman S, Marder SR. The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 1: test selection, reliability, and validity. Am J Psychiatry. 2008 165(2):203-13.

Madre, M., Canales‐Rodríguez, E. J., Ortiz‐Gil, J., Murru, A., Torrent, C., Bramon, E, Amann, B. L. Neuropsychological and neuroimaging underpinnings of schizoaffective disorder: a systematic review. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2016 134(1), 16-30.

Uribe E, Wix R. Neuronal migration, apoptosis and bipolar disorder. Rev PsiquiatrSaludMent 2012 5:127-133.

Tuulio-Henriksson A, Partonen T, Suvisaari J, Haukka J, Lönnqvist J. Age at onset and cognitive functioning in schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry. 2004 185:215-9.

Bergh S, Hjorthøj C, Sørensen HJ, Fagerlund B, Austin S, Secher RG, Jepsen JR, Nordentoft M. Predictors and longitudinal course of cognitive functioning in schizophrenia spectrum disorders, 10years after baseline: The OPUS study. Schizophr Res. 2016 175(1-3):57-63.

Orellana G, Slachevsky A. Executive Functioning in Schizophrenia. Front Psychiatry. 2013 4:35.

Keefe RS, Goldberg TE, Harvey PD, Gold JM, Poe MP, Coughenour L. The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia: reliability, sensitivity, and comparison with a standard neurocognitive battery. Schizophr Res. 2004 68: 283-297.

Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
  1. Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
  2. Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
  3. Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).